Faced with the question “What is the capital of the Netherlands?” you have a few possible responses:
Large Language Models (LLMs) face the same challenge. They excel when a question falls inside their training data, but when it doesn’t, they may “hallucinate,” producing an answer that sounds plausible but is wrong.
The key difference is that LLMs don’t have direct access to your enterprise data or knowledge bases without additional retrieval methods. That’s where Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) comes in.
RAG is the process of giving an LLM access to relevant, external information so it can answer queries more accurately. The typical RAG workflow looks like this:
The value of RAG is that it allows models of any size to deliver high-quality, context-aware answers, whether it’s the latest company policy, current product details, or niche industry knowledge. But RAG doesn’t operate in isolation. For RAG to deliver consistently, it needs to be part of a well-designed information environment, also known as context engineering.
In the early days, “prompt engineering” was the art of crafting the right wording to get the right answer. But as AI systems have grown more complex, the industry has realized that context quality of context matters more than the cleverness of the prompt.
Context engineering builds the full information environment around the LLM, not just the immediate instruction, but also system settings, past conversation history, retrieved documents, tools, and output formats.
RAG is a critical part of context engineering, ensuring that the model’s “world” includes the exact information needed for the task.
In real-world deployments, many RAG systems disappoint, and the issue is almost never the model. It’s bad context engineering. Common pitfalls include:
Imagine an AI system reviewing legal contracts that confidently reports a key clause is missing. In reality, the clause exists, but the retrieval process never pulled it into the model’s context. This kind of gap shows why careful retrieval design is essential.
Preventing these failures starts with designing retrieval around the business use case:
Done well, RAG produces grounded, fresh, scalable, and personalized AI outputs. But in many real-world environments, not all the information you need is text. From images and videos to audio clips and charts, handling different content formats introduces new retrieval challenges — and that’s where multi-modal context comes in.
Most embedding models are optimized for a single type of data, and text models usually outperform others. Multi-modal embeddings (for example, image plus text models) often underdeliver in production.
A surprisingly effective solution is to convert all content to text before retrieval.
For example:
By indexing text representations, retrieval accuracy for non-text content improves dramatically.
OneSix built an AI-powered chatbot for a higher education client to help students get answers faster.
Our Work in Action
Elevating the student experience with AI-powered search
By applying RAG, the chatbot summarized thousands of unstructured documents, giving students accurate answers instantly and helping the university better serve its community.
Real-world RAG success comes from context engineering, feeding models the right information to deliver accurate, reliable, business-ready answers.